Abortion : Différence entre versions

De UMMO WIKI
Aller à : navigation, rechercher
(Page créée avec « Abortion issues ... {{Lettre|D539| UMMOAELEUEE Language Spanish Number of copies ONE Addressed to the wife of Jorge Barrenechea and himself whom we make depositary.... »)
 
Ligne 3 : Ligne 3 :
  
 
{{Lettre|D539|
 
{{Lettre|D539|
 
 
UMMOAELEUEE
 
Language Spanish
 
Number of copies ONE
 
  
 
Addressed to the wife of Jorge Barrenechea and himself whom we make depositary.
 
Addressed to the wife of Jorge Barrenechea and himself whom we make depositary.
  
Dear Mr Jorge:
+
Dear Mr Jorge.
  
 
Over the last few days you have been asking us about the very diverse themes. Exhibiting each of them would take up an enormous amount of paper. But we seemed to observe a high level of emotion in the question concerning the voluntary termination of the gestation phase of the nascent human.
 
Over the last few days you have been asking us about the very diverse themes. Exhibiting each of them would take up an enormous amount of paper. But we seemed to observe a high level of emotion in the question concerning the voluntary termination of the gestation phase of the nascent human.
Ligne 39 : Ligne 34 :
  
 
Every living being is in one-to-one correspondence with two extreme Universes in the Cosmos family, with light speeds of C0 C1 C2 C3 ......... Cn (these extreme Universes being of zero mass and infinite mass respectively).
 
Every living being is in one-to-one correspondence with two extreme Universes in the Cosmos family, with light speeds of C0 C1 C2 C3 ......... Cn (these extreme Universes being of zero mass and infinite mass respectively).
 +
 
Communication with the zero-mass Universe is only possible for OEMII. This is precisely how we differentiate ourselves from NON-HUMAN organisms, such as a protozoan or a feline, a spore or a kidney, because we don't apply the term HUMAN to an organ like the human spleen or lung, but to the entire OEMII.
 
Communication with the zero-mass Universe is only possible for OEMII. This is precisely how we differentiate ourselves from NON-HUMAN organisms, such as a protozoan or a feline, a spore or a kidney, because we don't apply the term HUMAN to an organ like the human spleen or lung, but to the entire OEMII.
 
For us, an isolated organ such as the nerve trunk, the cerebellum or the gall bladder constitute networks similar to a mammal or a conifer.
 
For us, an isolated organ such as the nerve trunk, the cerebellum or the gall bladder constitute networks similar to a mammal or a conifer.
 
Life is therefore a holistic concept that integrates a material process, which grows richer with increasing complexity, entities whose substrate capable of engramming information is housed in two other cosmoses, and atomic micro-networks whose function is to decode and encode. Transmitting and receiving intercosmic information. The common denominator of all these factors is negentropy. We could, however, attempt a simplified definition of LIFE
 
Life is therefore a holistic concept that integrates a material process, which grows richer with increasing complexity, entities whose substrate capable of engramming information is housed in two other cosmoses, and atomic micro-networks whose function is to decode and encode. Transmitting and receiving intercosmic information. The common denominator of all these factors is negentropy. We could, however, attempt a simplified definition of LIFE
  
LIFE IS NEGENTROPY
 
DEATH IS ENTROPY
 
 
Perhaps the most obvious characteristics of a LIVING biophysical NETWORK are Firstly: to store information at the MESOPHYSICAL and MICROBIOLOGICAL levels. Second: TO REPRODUCE ITSELF by its own means. Third: REACT to the environment after capturing the information. Third: PROCESS information. Fourth: METABOLIZE matter from the outside.
 
 
The concept of PERSON has never been defined on UMMO. It's a notion that originated on Earth and surprised us when we came to your cold star. That's right. In the scientific field, there are very diaphanous concepts that can be understood by a Spaniard, an Anglo-Saxon or one of my brothers from UMMO. For example, a series of phonemes such as "MICROONDES" "MICROWAVE" "(OOAYE SAUUA)" are words which in various languages have a definite meaning. Oscillations with very short periods and centimetric or metric wavelengths.
 
 
A physicist from any country on Earth will have no difficulty in understanding these and other concepts such as "electron" or "rotational". Any biologist will have a sufficiently clear idea of what is meant by "blastomer" or "cord". These are not conventional concepts, but biunivocal correspondences between words and real physicobiological entities.
 
 
But the semantic concept differs when it comes to symbols, conventional codes or legal concepts. Do you use RED, VIOLET, ROSACE OR LILAC as a symbol of danger?
 
Germany's Nazis used the swastika and the legal concepts of "person" "abuse" "spouse" "airspace" "natural law" are so vague and evanescent that they receive antagonistic treatment under various legislative codes separated in space and time.
 
 
In this way, a concept such as PERSON cannot be defined on its own without a commission of expert jurists or theologians AGREEing to give it a capricious meaning in a specific time and place.
 
 
It is here that the "being in gestation" is considered by certain legislations as an "object of Law" and is denied any legal status in other legal frameworks.
 
Are we, the brothers of UMMO, persons for the jurists of the Earth?
 
It's obvious that we don't have a legal personality, just as insects and fungi don't have one. Any Earth scientist, if he captured us, could make us the object of his biological experiments as if we were guinea pigs without breaking any laws, because in the eyes of the legislator, OEMMII from another planetary star do not enter into his concept of persons.
 
 
Any discussion of whether or not the fetus is a PERSON is as sterile and incongruous as starting a controversy over "danger is red or lilac". Religious jurists will assert that the embryo is a "Person", influenced by their religious faith, and secular materialistic legislators will advocate that it cannot be granted this status until the unborn being emerges from the uterine cavity. The subject would not be exhausted because there would be a generalized consensus for or against it, as it would continue to be converted into a convention with no scientific correlation,
 
  
Nor does it shed any light to define the being in gestation in terms associated with HUMAN LIFE or NON-LIFE.
 
  
 
HUMAN LIFE is any molar or molecular portion of human tissue (a muscle or colon are molar portions. A few epithelial cells are molecular portions). We understand a human cell to be one in whose cell nucleus 46 human chromosomes exist.
 
HUMAN LIFE is any molar or molecular portion of human tissue (a muscle or colon are molar portions. A few epithelial cells are molecular portions). We understand a human cell to be one in whose cell nucleus 46 human chromosomes exist.
Ligne 78 : Ligne 54 :
  
 
In another supposition, a biotechnician manages to synthesize in the laboratory, as we have done, a large chain of genes corresponding to that of a human being. For many years we on Ummo have been able to melt down a large nucleotide sequence to synthesize human beings, although in practice the process is reduced to biotechnical studies with no further consequences.
 
In another supposition, a biotechnician manages to synthesize in the laboratory, as we have done, a large chain of genes corresponding to that of a human being. For many years we on Ummo have been able to melt down a large nucleotide sequence to synthesize human beings, although in practice the process is reduced to biotechnical studies with no further consequences.
 +
 
It's obvious that this scientist can inject this charge into an ovum, which in short constitutes the structure of a diploid zygote.
 
It's obvious that this scientist can inject this charge into an ovum, which in short constitutes the structure of a diploid zygote.
  
Ligne 83 : Ligne 60 :
  
 
In this way, the controversy between believers and skeptics in the Earth's Social Network is quite insoluble, as we focus on problems such as whether or not the fetus is a person, whether or not it is a human Life.
 
In this way, the controversy between believers and skeptics in the Earth's Social Network is quite insoluble, as we focus on problems such as whether or not the fetus is a person, whether or not it is a human Life.
 +
 
But for men who accept a religious creed, the problem centers on another important question. When does the soul become associated with the unborn being? At the moment of fertilization? When the former zygote becomes morula?  When the various tissues of the embryo begin to differentiate?
 
But for men who accept a religious creed, the problem centers on another important question. When does the soul become associated with the unborn being? At the moment of fertilization? When the former zygote becomes morula?  When the various tissues of the embryo begin to differentiate?
  
Ligne 98 : Ligne 76 :
  
 
On the other hand, our concept of Soul is singularly different from that of scholastic and neo-scholastic thinkers. For them and other believers of different religions, the soul or spirit is a timeless, adimensional immaterial entity that cannot therefore BE in a space-time continuum and therefore has no Matter Energy and parts.
 
On the other hand, our concept of Soul is singularly different from that of scholastic and neo-scholastic thinkers. For them and other believers of different religions, the soul or spirit is a timeless, adimensional immaterial entity that cannot therefore BE in a space-time continuum and therefore has no Matter Energy and parts.
 +
 
Such a concept lacks logic, because we don't understand that an entity can thus be aware of information, which is a quantified entity and therefore "made up of parts". Religious dualists find it impossible to explain why, when an OEMMII suffers from lipothymia or experiences anaesthesia, the soul, if it exists, ceases to be aware of images and memories. On the other hand, an indivisible entity cannot progress or vary in successive states. The contradiction is so diaphanous that it amazes us that any intelligent scientist on Earth would reject this notion as superstitious and illogical.
 
Such a concept lacks logic, because we don't understand that an entity can thus be aware of information, which is a quantified entity and therefore "made up of parts". Religious dualists find it impossible to explain why, when an OEMMII suffers from lipothymia or experiences anaesthesia, the soul, if it exists, ceases to be aware of images and memories. On the other hand, an indivisible entity cannot progress or vary in successive states. The contradiction is so diaphanous that it amazes us that any intelligent scientist on Earth would reject this notion as superstitious and illogical.
  
Ligne 103 : Ligne 82 :
  
 
A network of IBOZSOO UHUU can conform as atomic particles, as Time, as space, but also as a simple substrate of information capable of engramming it. In this way, and contrary to what you may believe, information does not necessarily have to be carried by a flow of energy or stored in a substrate of matter.
 
A network of IBOZSOO UHUU can conform as atomic particles, as Time, as space, but also as a simple substrate of information capable of engramming it. In this way, and contrary to what you may believe, information does not necessarily have to be carried by a flow of energy or stored in a substrate of matter.
 +
 
This only happens in non-zero-mass Universes. There is a ZERO-mass Cosmos capable of storing data on the non-material foundation formed by long strings of U.I.s. For us (B.), SOUL does not transcend space and time. It has a location, and there is the possibility, scientifically confirmed by us, that it can transfer information with our Universe.
 
This only happens in non-zero-mass Universes. There is a ZERO-mass Cosmos capable of storing data on the non-material foundation formed by long strings of U.I.s. For us (B.), SOUL does not transcend space and time. It has a location, and there is the possibility, scientifically confirmed by us, that it can transfer information with our Universe.
 +
 
The soul is not just the RES COGITANS postulated by Descartes. The soul doesn't think. THE BRAIN THINKS. The soul stores data and governs the spatio-temporal behavior of the human organism (WILL) through the interplay of U.I. sequences and cortical neural networks.
 
The soul is not just the RES COGITANS postulated by Descartes. The soul doesn't think. THE BRAIN THINKS. The soul stores data and governs the spatio-temporal behavior of the human organism (WILL) through the interplay of U.I. sequences and cortical neural networks.
 +
 
The (B.) is capable of consciousness only if Krypton's transceivers link it to the human brain. When the human body establishes another soul connection with the (B.B=) COLLECTIVE PSYCHE located in another Cosmos, the soul will be able to go on conscientizing. That's why, when you're anaesthetized, the connection is lost (it's like switching off your transceiver) and there seems to be a death of the spirit. Is it possible for a record engrammed with music to manifest its content if we disconnect it from its phono-sensor and the amplification or transduction chain?
 
The (B.) is capable of consciousness only if Krypton's transceivers link it to the human brain. When the human body establishes another soul connection with the (B.B=) COLLECTIVE PSYCHE located in another Cosmos, the soul will be able to go on conscientizing. That's why, when you're anaesthetized, the connection is lost (it's like switching off your transceiver) and there seems to be a death of the spirit. Is it possible for a record engrammed with music to manifest its content if we disconnect it from its phono-sensor and the amplification or transduction chain?
  
Ligne 127 : Ligne 109 :
  
 
Don't the few fanatical critics of voluntary termination of pregnancy realize that in many cases the social, physiological and mental consequences (for both the unborn child and the mother) of birth are more serious than the alleged bioethical offence that follows any disruption of a negentropic process?
 
Don't the few fanatical critics of voluntary termination of pregnancy realize that in many cases the social, physiological and mental consequences (for both the unborn child and the mother) of birth are more serious than the alleged bioethical offence that follows any disruption of a negentropic process?
 +
 
Don't they understand that they should be just as zealous in denouncing violations of rights as serious as torture, war, the violation of man's privacy and freedom, his right to work, famine and the misery of millions of Oemmii who lack food precisely because of super-inflation of the population?
 
Don't they understand that they should be just as zealous in denouncing violations of rights as serious as torture, war, the violation of man's privacy and freedom, his right to work, famine and the misery of millions of Oemmii who lack food precisely because of super-inflation of the population?
  
Our Bioethics is based on the defense of the Neguentropic Flow in a Universe where the norm is the Entropic Counterflow. The principle of destroying an organism is a violation of divine law, but it can't be expressed in this simplistic way without taking into account the other interrelations and consequences precisely for the system's global negentropy. In another way, killing bacteria, sacrificing a Heifer on Earth would constitute a violation of the Moral Law. But any of you can understand that the benefits derived from these acts
+
Our Bioethics is based on the defense of the Neguentropic Flow in a Universe where the norm is the Entropic Counterflow. The principle of destroying an organism is a violation of divine law, but it can't be expressed in this simplistic way without taking into account the other interrelations and consequences precisely for the system's global negentropy. In another way, killing bacteria, sacrificing a Heifer on Earth would constitute a violation of the Moral Law. But any of you can understand that the benefits derived from these acts are obviously licit because of the benefits they bring.
 
 
are obviously licit because of the benefits they bring.
 
  
 
Killing a human embryo on a whim, fighting a Bull in a Spanish square with suffering for the animal, allowing millions of children to die of starvation, using a bomb in a terrorist attack are clearly violations of the Moral Law.
 
Killing a human embryo on a whim, fighting a Bull in a Spanish square with suffering for the animal, allowing millions of children to die of starvation, using a bomb in a terrorist attack are clearly violations of the Moral Law.
Ligne 140 : Ligne 121 :
 
We only wish you the mental Light to dispassionately elucidate these great truths, with the effort of your scientists and thinkers. It only remains for us to watch you gripped and respectfully saddened by the ocean of ignorance that surrounds you. It's only natural that this should be so. You are still in an early phase of OEMII evolution. One day, the dawn of a new era will illuminate the darkness of your tormented brains with its phosphorescent effluvia.
 
We only wish you the mental Light to dispassionately elucidate these great truths, with the effort of your scientists and thinkers. It only remains for us to watch you gripped and respectfully saddened by the ocean of ignorance that surrounds you. It's only natural that this should be so. You are still in an early phase of OEMII evolution. One day, the dawn of a new era will illuminate the darkness of your tormented brains with its phosphorescent effluvia.
  
I wish to be your faithful friend, Carmen Maria, to your husband and brothers. It is to you, as a woman who has sometimes suffered male incomprehension, that this letter is addressed. My name is INDOO 33 Daughter of INDOO 29. Emotionally, I place my hand on your august breast}}
+
I wish to be your faithful friend, Carmen Maria, to your husband and brothers. It is to you, as a woman who has sometimes suffered male incomprehension, that this letter is addressed. My name is INDOO 33 Daughter of INDOO 29. Emotionally, I place my hand on your august breast
 +
}}

Version du 8 mars 2024 à 10:25

Abortion issues ...

Lettre D539
{{{2}}}